Will the Roberts Court stand down on the Tennessee Wine Case?

By |2020-04-13T20:45:24+00:00December 31st, 2018|Liquor Case Discussion|

As the liquor industry anticipates a groundbreaking decision in the Tennessee Wine and Spirits Retailers Association v. Blair (Tennessee Wine) case, the Supreme Court has the option to render a decision and yet at the same time defer making any groundbreaking legal precedent. To all us legal geeks out there, it is a disappointing option […]

Irish Liquor Lawyer to cover the Tennessee Wine case at the U.S. Supreme Court

By |2018-12-29T12:51:28+00:00December 29th, 2018|Breaking News, Liquor Case Discussion|

Great News, Irish Liquor Lawyer, Sean O’Leary, was granted credentials to cover the oral argument for the Tennessee Wine and Spirits Retailers Association v. Blair case at the U.S. Supreme Court. I will be reporting live from the Supreme Court on January 16th on this groundbreaking liquor case!

Reading the tea leaves on the Lebamoff decision: 7th Circuit says no to Illinois law

By |2020-04-13T21:10:21+00:00December 9th, 2018|Liquor Case Discussion|

 

Introduction

The Lebamoff  case out of the 7th Circuit was a strongly written opinion by Chief Judge Diane Wood to influence the Supreme Court’s direction in the upcoming Tennessee Wine case.

Judge Wood makes a power play into the Supreme Court Wine Shipping Case

By |2018-11-30T08:56:03+00:00November 30th, 2018|Breaking News, Liquor Case Discussion|

Disclaimer: The analysis does not reflect my personal opinion, but is a legal analysis of the case
With a Supreme Court case already in the hopper, why did the 7th Circuit decide Lebamoff?

With a Supreme Court case, Tennessee Wine & Spirits Retailers Association v. Byrd, set for hearing that will probably deal with […]

WSWA’s nemesis Alex Tanford interviews with Irish Liquor Lawyer about Byrd and challenging the system and the potential of legal upheaval.

By |2020-04-13T20:44:34+00:00November 22nd, 2018|Breaking News, Liquor Case Discussion|

Introduction

A couple of weeks ago, I spoke to Professor Alex Tanford, who clearly is on the opposite side of WSWA. Professor Tanford successfully argued the Granholm case at the U.S. Supreme Court, which overturned New York and Michigan’s laws that restricted out-of-state wineries from shipping into their states.

After posting the WSWA press release […]

WSWA files amicus brief in Supreme Court case: read press release below

By |2020-04-13T20:44:34+00:00November 20th, 2018|Breaking News, Liquor Case Discussion|

Three-Tier System and State Authority to Regulate Alcohol are Supported by Twenty-First Amendment and Prior Supreme Court Cases, WSWA Notes in Amicus Filing

Association Files Brief in Tennessee Wine & Spirits Retailers Association v. Clayton Byrd, Et Al.

(WASHINGTON, D.C.) – The U.S. Supreme Court has long-upheld that the Twenty-first Amendment provides […]

Will Byrd actually tackle the most important constitutional issue?

By |2020-04-13T20:45:24+00:00October 15th, 2018|Liquor Case Discussion|

The conventional wisdom is that the Tennessee Wine and Spirits Retailers Association v. Byrd (Byrd) case would decide the most important constitutional issue facing the liquor world, whether Granholm extends to retailers.

The U.S. Supreme Court granted cert and should decide whether out-of-state retailers can ship into a state, or whether the states have complete power […]

The Lebamoff Michigan case: Are courts chipping away at the defense that laws are made to maintain the integrity of the three-tier system?

By |2020-04-13T20:45:24+00:00October 1st, 2018|Liquor Case Discussion|

 

Lebamoff, an Indiana retailer, sued the State of Michigan because it could not obtain a license to sell and ship its products from Indiana to Michigan customers. Michigan develop a license, a Specially Designed Merchant License (“SDM”), which allowed a license holder to deliver directly to Michigan consumers using a common-carrier, their own vehicles, or […]

LEBAMOFF DECISION: Tanford strikes again and wins in Michigan

By |2018-09-30T10:34:09+00:00September 30th, 2018|Breaking News, Liquor Case Discussion|

In a decision by a Michigan Federal District Court in Lebamoff, the Court ruled against Michigan’s statute that banned out-of-state retailers from shipping wine to in-state consumers.

The big issue the court decided was whether discrimination against interstate commerce on the retail tier as opposed to the producer tier is forbidden by the Commerce Clause or […]

Go to Top