8th Circuit hears oral arguments in the most important liquor case of the year

By |2020-04-13T20:45:04+00:00September 28th, 2019|Liquor Case Discussion|

 

Why Should we care?

The Missouri Broadcaster’s Association v. Taylor case holds great importance in the liquor world for two reasons:

1. The Court will require the state to produce evidence to prove that its laws are necessary to protect the public health, safety, and welfare. In a previous day, a sound legal theory was […]

What Federal Circuit will influence the future of liquor law?

By |2020-04-13T20:45:24+00:00September 16th, 2019|Liquor Case Discussion, Liquor Industry Insights|

 

With so many Federal Circuit Courts (Circuit or Circuits) hearing cases on liquor issues, one may wonder which Circuit will become the predominant oracle on liquor issues. Looking for a concise answer to this question becomes murkier when you consider that numerous Circuits will make decisions that are similar if not identical to decisions in […]

NCSLA Panel on the impact of Tennessee Wine case on the liquor industry

By |2020-04-13T21:10:48+00:00September 10th, 2019|Breaking News, Liquor Case Discussion|

Great speaking at the NCSLA on the panel, “The Rise of the Retail Tier and the Impact of Tennessee Wine & Spirits
Retailers Association vs. Thomas.”

Jo Moak did a great job moderating, will provide a detail review later

 

Orion v. Applesmith, Director of California ABC: A decision without a resolution

By |2020-04-13T21:10:21+00:00August 25th, 2019|Liquor Case Discussion|

 

Facts

Orion is a Florida licensed importer and wholesaler that would like to import product and sell it directly to California retailers. It seeks a license to become a California importer. A California importer can also obtain a wholesaler license and transfer the product from its importer license to its wholesaler license and then […]

Federal Judge rules in favor of California ABC on Commerce Clause Challenge

By |2020-04-13T20:42:30+00:00August 19th, 2019|Breaking News, Liquor Case Discussion|

A California Federal District Court dismissed a Commerce Clause challenge against a California law which required an importer to have a physical location in California in order to sell to California retailers.

Additionally, the Court rejected the Plaintiff’s Privilege and Immunities challenge to the California law.

Nevertheless, the Court granted the plaintiff’s leave to amend their complaint […]

5th Circuit reverses and remands a District Court decision finding that the Texas Public Corporation ban was unconstitutional

By |2020-04-13T20:45:04+00:00August 18th, 2019|Liquor Case Discussion|

Takeaways

The 5th Circuit took the District Court to task for ruling that the Texas ban on Public corporations owning a P-Store license discriminated against out-of-state entities in violation of the Commerce Clause and that the law placed a burden on inter-state commerce.

In Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission, No 18-50299 (5th […]

Do wine and liquor sales put a target on a state’s back?

By |2020-04-13T20:42:30+00:00August 15th, 2019|Liquor Case Discussion, Liquor Industry Insights|

New Hampshire boast something that its New England neighbors don’t, a non-existent sales tax rate.

Recently New Hampshire decided to flex its tax-free muscles and brag about its advantages over its neighbors. Specifically, State run liquor stores in New Hampshire targeted customers in Maine, Massachusetts, and Vermont.

The New Hampshire state run stores posted an ad on […]

A Little Wine Causes the State of Mississippi to do Some Funny Things

By |2020-04-13T20:45:04+00:00August 5th, 2019|Liquor Case Discussion|

Sometimes in life a little alcohol can cause us to do some funny things.

In Mississippi a little wine is causing upheaval in the legal system. The state has decided that it can control legal matters beyond his borders and reach into another state to pursue legally liability.

Facts

The State of Mississippi, led by agents […]

Mississippi Supreme Court agrees to retain Wine Express case

By |2020-04-13T21:11:03+00:00July 30th, 2019|Liquor Case Discussion|

The Mississippi Supreme Court has entered an order retaining the Hood v. Wine Express case. This case could play a major role in limiting a state’s jurisdiction over liquor law enforcement.

https://courts.ms.gov/appellatecourts/docket/sendPDF.php?f=710_456687.pdf&c=88937&a=N&s=2

In response to the Mississippi Attorney General’s Brief in Wine Express Case

By |2020-04-13T20:42:31+00:00July 30th, 2019|Liquor Case Discussion|

Caveat

Although there are numerous items I take issue with in the Attorney General’s brief, I will focus on their jurisdictional analysis and where I respectfully disagree with them. I may choose in another post to examine some of their other arguments such as purposeful availment. But for sake of brevity I will focus […]

Go to Top