In response to the Mississippi Attorney General’s Brief in Wine Express Case

By |2020-04-13T20:42:31+00:00July 30th, 2019|Liquor Case Discussion|

Caveat

Although there are numerous items I take issue with in the Attorney General’s brief, I will focus on their jurisdictional analysis and where I respectfully disagree with them. I may choose in another post to examine some of their other arguments such as purposeful availment. But for sake of brevity I will focus […]

Mayhem in Mississippi: Irish Liquor Lawyer writes amicus brief in Wine Express v. Hood

By |2020-04-13T21:11:03+00:00July 14th, 2019|Breaking News, Liquor Case Discussion|

Irish Liquor Lawyer files amicus brief in the Mississippi wine shipping case. I am truly honored that Wine Freedom asked me to draft an amicus brief on their behalf in the Hood v. Wine Express Inc. case.

This is an important case that could shape the future of how alcohol is sold and enhance direct to […]

NCSLA 2019 Louisville, Part II: Understanding 3rd party arrangements

By |2020-04-13T21:10:48+00:00July 8th, 2019|Conference Reviews|

Do I really Understand (How to Get Product to Consumers) APs, Custom Production, Fulfillment Houses, and Brand Building?

Moderator: Carrie Bonnington

Panelists: Laine Adderley; Paul Gatza; and Tom Kirby.

A great panel moderated by Carrie Bonnington who always does an amazing job moderating a panel.

This panel had an interesting perspective, it dealt with issues […]

Irish Liquor Lawyer predicted the Tennessee Wine case correctly

By |2019-06-26T11:54:09+00:00June 26th, 2019|Breaking News, Liquor Case Discussion|

In a previous post I predicted that Justice Samuel Alito would write the opinion in Tennessee Wine and that it would be written broadly.

Justice Alito wrote the opinion and settled the Granholm debate. I figured how the opinions were going that Alito would write it. Based on his questioning in oral argument I knew that he […]

Go to Top