The Lebamoff Michigan case: Are courts chipping away at the defense that laws are made to maintain the integrity of the three-tier system?

By |2020-04-13T20:45:24+00:00October 1st, 2018|Liquor Case Discussion|

 

Lebamoff, an Indiana retailer, sued the State of Michigan because it could not obtain a license to sell and ship its products from Indiana to Michigan customers. Michigan develop a license, a Specially Designed Merchant License (“SDM”), which allowed a license holder to deliver directly to Michigan consumers using a common-carrier, their own vehicles, or […]

LEBAMOFF DECISION: Tanford strikes again and wins in Michigan

By |2018-09-30T10:34:09+00:00September 30th, 2018|Breaking News, Liquor Case Discussion|

In a decision by a Michigan Federal District Court in Lebamoff, the Court ruled against Michigan’s statute that banned out-of-state retailers from shipping wine to in-state consumers.

The big issue the court decided was whether discrimination against interstate commerce on the retail tier as opposed to the producer tier is forbidden by the Commerce Clause or […]

Speed is important but accuracy is paramount: How I dealt with the Byrd Supreme Court cert. issue

By |2020-04-13T21:10:22+00:00September 28th, 2018|Liquor Case Discussion|

Here is an explanation on my adventures with the United States Supreme Court yesterday. I posted yesterday around 1:30pm that the court granted cert in the Byrd v. Tennessee Wine & Spirits Retailers case. Around 2:30pm I had to repost on my blog that the link to the page that granted cert disappeared, mysteriously. Here […]

Update from the Supreme Court about Byrd case

By |2020-04-13T20:45:24+00:00September 27th, 2018|Breaking News, Liquor Case Discussion|

Earlier today the Supreme Court posted on their website that they granted to Cert to hear the Byrd v. Tennessee Wine & Spirits Retailers case. This case has huge implications on the liquor as the Supreme Court could be deciding whether Granholm extends to retailers or whether it is limited to manufacturers.

Even though two other sources, […]

Federal Court rules against state liquor statutes and regulations without a 21st Amendment analysis

By |2018-07-19T22:04:35+00:00July 19th, 2018|Liquor Case Discussion|

Image result for court
Importance

In a potentially groundbreaking case a federal district overturned a state’s regulations and statute that restricted alcohol advertising practices. The case’s potential importance is that it made the decision without considering the effects of the 21st Amendment. Secondly, the Court noted that the […]

Lebamoff Takes On The State Of Illinois

By |2020-04-13T21:11:03+00:00July 1st, 2018|Liquor Case Discussion|

This summary does not reflect my personal viewpoint but merely predicts what I think will occur based on the oral argument before the 7th Circuit.

 

Prediction

The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals will not let stand the District Court’s ruling granting summary judgment in favor of Illinois. Ironically, if they remand the case, the original judge retired, […]

Go to Top